endersaka
Active member
- Messages
- 58
Gorgeous! And boy did you ever do nice work on that profile.
Thanks.

Disclaimer: beware, I say all the following things, not for arguing but because I believe that artists should know what they are doing and the origin of the things that inspired them. Even if they decide to take a complete different path than the "traditional" one.
I love Tolkien. He describes his elves very well.
I love Tolkien too, though, about the physical description there is not much. By the way, Iluvatar himself says, in "The Silmarillion":
But the Quendi shall be the fairest of all earthly creatures, and they shall have and shall conceive and bring forth more beauty than all my Children; and they shall have the greater bliss in this world
Therefore, we know that they shall be "the fairest of all earthly creatures", and be more beautiful of all Iluvatar's children.
Which reminds me of the passage from Prose Edda (13th century collection of old myths, often accounted for containing the most direct description of elves):
Ljósálfar eru fegri en sól sýnum
Which means: "Light-Elves are fairer to look upon than the sun". Light-Elves because there were, of course, Dark-Elves too, and they were dark as pitch. Light-Elves used to live in Alfheimr, "Home of Elves", a land ruled by Freyr, brother of Freyja.
In general, in the old myths elves were described as human-like (and human-sized) creatures.
Volund himself is accounted as an elf, according to many researchers. He is the god of smithcraft and formidable sorcerer, which make me think of the ability in jewelry craft that Tolkien attributed to his elves and their connection with magic.
Often, kings were accounted as elves, in other sagas, or humans with elf blood.
Elves were not necessarily good. They were believed to represent a threat for humans, bringing disease or representing a sexual threat for maidens.
The gnome-sized or fairy-like with pointy ears creatures of the later folklore (particularly exalted in Victorian age and early 20th century, including the Christmas elves - which I hate with all my hearth
) are not part of the original Norse and Germanic myths. In particular in fairy tales folklore "fairy" and "elf" were often considered terms to identify the same creatures.The pointy ears in Tolkien's elves are an addition introduced by artists (and it seems unbelievably impossible to identify the first one responsible for it) probably because of the association of elf with fairies.
About Harry Potter, as I already said, I do not like the films, so, I am personally reluctant to deepen in the franchise or the books. I personally do not like a single one of the characters or the designs of the movie and the overall story of Harry Potter is boring and childish to me. For comparison, I consider "The Sword in the Stone", "Snowwhite" or "Sleeping Beauty" and other early Disney film much more complex, interesting and adult than Harry Potter. In particular I really hate the depiction of Harry Potter's elves

I think elves and fairies have many different descriptions fiction and folklore and legends. Same with angels. Which gives us the creative freedom to express them however we wish!
Absolutely. If we speak of creativity, we can do whatever we want. It doesn't matter what. After all, even the elves of Tolkien are not the elves of the myths, while pretty close.