OliveOyl
Well-known member
- Messages
- 292
I guess this is what we’re supposed to do...post our stuff. Amirite? So, because I like to tell a bit BEFORE I show, here’s the babble bit.
Generally..........I work in a series of three and these days, I get a lot of inspiration from Pinterest. When I end up inside a rabbit hole, I know something has gotten my attention. Maybe this idea started (but not remembering anymore) when I was looking at Frida Kahlo, and then onto medical corsets, and then onto “regular” corsets. As a feminist, they (the idea of them) confuse me. Are they liberating or objectifying? Girly frillyness or practical contraption? Should they be hidden or revealed? Are they designed for a woman or, for the menz? I didn’t want to highlight the body of a female as she looks inside one (that’s SOOO 1990’s male gazey) but rather, on the corset itself. It’s like an objectification of an object of objectification? They’re all 30 x 40, from 2016.
This was a (sexy, IMO) steampunk corset but what struck me was that it also reminded me of horses and hides and being roped and tied. Ahem. See the little needles poking through the heart? RAWHIDE
No doubt, some have a clown-like, silly, burlesque(ness) to them, so why not mock one by placing it against the backdrop of a fat kid circus poster? The surface behind the corset was sanded back and rubbed over with yellow ochre. BIG TOP
The last was inspired by “reptilian printed fabric” on an Alexander McQueen dress. It was shimmery and other worldly and so I stole it and recreated it as underwater-underwear skin. No, goldfish don't live in the ocean and yes, her skin has a zipper. SHE SHELL
Generally..........I work in a series of three and these days, I get a lot of inspiration from Pinterest. When I end up inside a rabbit hole, I know something has gotten my attention. Maybe this idea started (but not remembering anymore) when I was looking at Frida Kahlo, and then onto medical corsets, and then onto “regular” corsets. As a feminist, they (the idea of them) confuse me. Are they liberating or objectifying? Girly frillyness or practical contraption? Should they be hidden or revealed? Are they designed for a woman or, for the menz? I didn’t want to highlight the body of a female as she looks inside one (that’s SOOO 1990’s male gazey) but rather, on the corset itself. It’s like an objectification of an object of objectification? They’re all 30 x 40, from 2016.
This was a (sexy, IMO) steampunk corset but what struck me was that it also reminded me of horses and hides and being roped and tied. Ahem. See the little needles poking through the heart? RAWHIDE
No doubt, some have a clown-like, silly, burlesque(ness) to them, so why not mock one by placing it against the backdrop of a fat kid circus poster? The surface behind the corset was sanded back and rubbed over with yellow ochre. BIG TOP
The last was inspired by “reptilian printed fabric” on an Alexander McQueen dress. It was shimmery and other worldly and so I stole it and recreated it as underwater-underwear skin. No, goldfish don't live in the ocean and yes, her skin has a zipper. SHE SHELL